- March 22nd, 2006, 3:17 pm
#9098
didn't mean to come off as an ACC basher but I used them as an example. I don't think the Big East would do any better nor the Big Ten. Those are tough places to play. So you would take 7 of the 12 at the CAA top 4 but I am saying I would take Duke, to win 3 or 4, Carolina (this season) 2 of 4 BC would win 2 of 4 and NC State might win 1 of 4. The rest would get beat up. FSU would actually do better than most because they have a really, really athletic team but, UVA, Clemson, VA Tech, Maryland, Miami, Wake Forest would get beat 3 of 4 on a 4 game sweep through the top CAA teams (again, this year). The top 4 btw are Hofstra, ODU, George Mason and UNC Wilmington. Gone are the days when the Power conferences just show up and win games on the road vs. the Better Mid major teams/conferences. I don't know the MVC that well but I would say that teams would probably struggle going on the road against their top 4 or 5 teams too. There are so many guys in the CAA that could play and do well in the ACC is all I am saying and collectively, they form a pretty good challenge to the Power conferences. Alex Loughton, Arnuld Dahi (ODU) Jai Lewis, Butler, Skinn (GMU) and others would do well in those leagues. There are too many quality players out there now. At one time all the big boys would snatch up the talent and that talent would stay there for 4 years. The gap is closed because the talent pool has increased dramatically over the past 20 years, the Power conferences lose players at a much higher rate than 20 years ago, and the summer leagues allow the mid major players to play against the big guys and they learn that they can play with them. I firmly believe that the reason our Men's team beat UVA in 98 is because our guys had played summer pick up games with them for 4 summers straight prior to that game.