Future of this forum
Posted: April 28th, 2011, 10:04 am
Since wrestling will be come a club sport, will this forum be closed and any future posting about wrestling be done in the general sports forum?
https://forums.aseaofred.com/forums/
https://forums.aseaofred.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=17451
jcmanson wrote:I don't like having so many forums. I think football, basketball, women's bball and baseball are the only sports that deserve their own forum. JMHODon’t forget gender equity. Since the student body has more women than men, you need more boards for the girls. How about Softball, Field hockey, and Volleyball for the girls and Football, Basketball for the guys?
Aaron Bruce wrote:How about no. We don't have to comply with title IXjcmanson wrote:I don't like having so many forums. I think football, basketball, women's bball and baseball are the only sports that deserve their own forum. JMHODon’t forget gender equity. Since the student body has more women than men, you need more boards for the girls. How about Softball, Field hockey, and Volleyball for the girls and Football, Basketball for the guys?
jcmanson wrote:Yea baby, I have a convert!Aaron Bruce wrote:How about no. We don't have to comply with title IXjcmanson wrote:I don't like having so many forums. I think football, basketball, women's bball and baseball are the only sports that deserve their own forum. JMHODon’t forget gender equity. Since the student body has more women than men, you need more boards for the girls. How about Softball, Field hockey, and Volleyball for the girls and Football, Basketball for the guys?
BJWilliams wrote:Privately run message boards do not have to be gender equitable...this is about as crass as I'll get but did you shut your brain off before you made that statement Aaron? I mean seriously...did you not for a moment think "Hmm...maybe this sounds positively ludicrous to suggest that the board should have gender equality too...I mean it is an athletics board and all" FlameFans has never been a part of the Athletic Department of Liberty University and as such isnt subject to government regulation...now THAT would be a severe waste of taxpayers money (and they already waste plenty of it as is)He was being sarcastic. Basically his point, the same one he has had for 4 weeks now, is that if you feel that wrestling had to be cut, than that means you love Title IX.
BJWilliams wrote:Privately run message boards do not have to be gender equitable...this is about as crass as I'll get but did you shut your brain off before you made that statement Aaron? I mean seriously...did you not for a moment think "Hmm...maybe this sounds positively ludicrous to suggest that the board should have gender equality too...I mean it is an athletics board and all" FlameFans has never been a part of the Athletic Department of Liberty University and as such isnt subject to government regulation...now THAT would be a severe waste of taxpayers money (and they already waste plenty of it as is)I honestly hope you never leave this board....
BJWilliams wrote:Privately run message boards do not have to be gender equitable...this is about as crass as I'll get but did you shut your brain off before you made that statement Aaron? I mean seriously...did you not for a moment think "Hmm...maybe this sounds positively ludicrous to suggest that the board should have gender equality too...I mean it is an athletics board and all" FlameFans has never been a part of the Athletic Department of Liberty University and as such isnt subject to government regulation...now THAT would be a severe waste of taxpayers money (and they already waste plenty of it as is)As it has been pointed out a couple of times…yes, I was being sarcastic. But, and I am being serious now, If the federal government can require that your private donation to a private male team be given equally to a girls team, what IS next? You know, even at the state schools, no public money is used for sports-ALL private donations.
jbock13 wrote:No Aaron, you fail to realize everybody agrees with you on Title 9, but disagrees with almost everything else you've said.2 issues:
Aaron Bruce wrote:Please, debate me with specific examples that you disagree with me on.We've been doing so for about a month now my friend.
Aaron Bruce wrote: 1) Not everyone on this board agrees with me on Title IX. If you hadn’t noticed, Haize has mysteriously vanished after you first mentioned that you agreed with me on this issue. I still firmly believe there are “lurkers” on this board that think that Title IX must be a good law because, after all, who doesn’t want to be fair to the girls?Haize has been on this board for almost 5 years with almost 2 thousand posts. To call him a "lurker" is incredibly ignorant. Believe it or not, there were many other conversations on this board before you joined it. The whole reason your attempt of "revealing" posters and bringing up conspiracies has been laughed at is due to the fact that most posters know that this isn't the case at all. It only makes you seem paranoid. /rant
Aaron Bruce wrote:Because HAIZE's job requires a lot of traveling at the moment? I was in the Triangle last week, in INDY for 2 weeks then Dallas for a week. Soo it really has nothing to do with who agrees with what. ANd considering you have never clearly articulated my stance on Title IX it does not suprise me that you jump to unsubstantiated conclusionsjbock13 wrote:No Aaron, you fail to realize everybody agrees with you on Title 9, but disagrees with almost everything else you've said.
If you hadn’t noticed, Haize has mysteriously vanished after you first mentioned that you agreed with me on this issue. 2) .
NG33 wrote:You need to re-read my post…I never suggested HAIZE was a lurker. Clearly, it is very easy to search everyone’s post on this board-I obviously know he has been an active member of this board probably not too long after he left his position in our athletic department.Aaron Bruce wrote: 1) Not everyone on this board agrees with me on Title IX. If you hadn’t noticed, Haize has mysteriously vanished after you first mentioned that you agreed with me on this issue. I still firmly believe there are “lurkers” on this board that think that Title IX must be a good law because, after all, who doesn’t want to be fair to the girls?Haize has been on this board for almost 5 years with almost 2 thousand posts. To call him a "lurker" is incredibly ignorant. Believe it or not, there were many other conversations on this board before you joined it. The whole reason your attempt of "revealing" posters and bringing up conspiracies has been laughed at is due to the fact that most posters know that this isn't the case at all. It only makes you seem paranoid. /rant
Purple Haize wrote:ANd considering you have never clearly articulated my stance on Title IX it does not suprise me that you jump to unsubstantiated conclusionsOk, let me try. Is this your position?
jbock13 wrote:JUST BECAUSE SOMEBODY DISAGREES WITH YOU DOES NOT MEAN THEY ARE PART OF THE ATHLETIC DEPT!!!Sorry if I was giving that impression. One person has admitted to working in the department and I am under the impression that Haize was once an assistant AD. I would like to know if he truly was in the department but he doesn’t seem to want to identify himself. As I said earlier, being an alumnus and financial contributor to the athletic department, I am just curious if any of you guys are currently working or have in the past worked with the athletes. I am not really sure why you think this is a conspiracy theory. I really didn’t think it was that big of a deal “outing” people on this forum.